Search This Blog

Saturday, April 22, 2006

Mayil Ravanan - Part II

NOTE: Please read Part I posted below before reading the following.

What we have established till now is that Sita, the daughter of Ravana is growing up in India as Janak King's daughter. Now, the rest of the events that unfold need to be looked with the above fact in mind. While Sita grew up in Janakpuri, astrologers in Lanka told Ravana that her daughter still lives and she lives as Sita. Ravana was happy to hear this. When Sita's beauty became wide spread and the famous competition of strength (as to who can break the massive bow) came to Ravana's ears, Ravana didn't let go of this chance. He fled to Janak City right away in quest of laying his eyes again on his lost-daughter. When He saw the competition that lay ahead, He thought that there is no one who can beat him at his strength. Ravana was a very PROUD Man. He decided to test the Bow with his own strength to see if his daughter gets a worthy partner for life! When Ravana saw that Rama bent the bow, He was happy and genuinely wished them both a good married life. He came back to his Kingdom a happy father.

But Alas, as destiny would have it the news of Rama being banished from his kingdom for 14 yrs in a forest devastated his peace of mind. Ravana was extremely unhappy about the fact that Rama did not become the successor to the throne of Dasharatha and thereby his daughter didn't become a queen. He was troubled with worry to find out how his daughter will manage in the meager benefits of a forest. Looking at his devastated state, Shoorpanaka his sister volunteered to go and see with her own eyes if her niece Sita is being kept well by Rama. Shoorpanaka sees Rama with Sita and Lakshamana. She sees how handsome Rama is and wonders if he is really as true to his character as a dutiful husband should be? Is he really a righteous husband to her beloved niece? So, Shoorpanaka came to Rama and made lustful moves at him for which Rama did not even get tempted one bit, but Lakshmana's anger was something she wasnt aware of.. which resulted in Lakshamana cutting off her nose. This hostility angered Shoorpanaka and she ended up giving a bad review about Rama and Lakshmana to Ravanan in Lanka. Ravanan was now angered and decided that he will save his daughter from such ill-tempered boys. He decided to bring her back to Lanka. But, Ravana knew that he can't touch any woman without her consent. Therefore,He sent his Uncle who was a magician(MAYAVI) to distract Rama. But, the Lakshman's rekha had to be surpassed. Ravanan took the form of Rishi so that Sita can come with her own will to Ravanan. This is what happened and led to the abduction of Sita.

Although epic critics have for long seen this act of abduction as Ravana wanting to covet another man's wife, the truth is that Ravana wanted to bring his daughter to safety. If Ravanan wanted to achieve his lustful ways with Sita, he could have tortured her until she agreed. But no epic shows any evidence of Ravanan being cruel to his daughter at any point. It was Sita, who didn't know the entire truth about her past, who was feeling bad and accused Ravanan of keeping her away from her husband Rama. But, Hanuman came to Lanka and set it on fire with his tail. This created havoc in his kingdom resulting to loss and devastation of innocent subjects' property. What King in his right mind will not care about the injustice done to his kingdom? What King will forget his duties as the protector? Certainly Ravanan didnt and wouldn't. He decided that Rama and his army would have to pay for this and that is why Ravana went for war against Rama, even though Rama was his own Son-In-Law!

No one can escape from his destiny. Rama became the Hero of the epic and therefore Good was won over Evil. But, it was meant to win because Every single Incarnation of Vishnu holds this as the main truth! But, Did u know that Ravana and his brother Kumbhakarna were Cursedd to this? Yes, Ravanan and his brother Kumbhakarnan are two Asuras who guard the gates of "VAIKUNTA" (the heavenly abode where Lord Vishnu Lives). When a Sage came and wanted to meet Lord Vishnu both the Asuras denied entrance because their Lord was resting at that time. The Sage's anger erupted and he cursed the two Asuras to be finding their death in the hands of their Lord in every single incarnation of Vishnu. In Ramayan, Kumbhakarna and Ravana both find their demise in hands of Lord Rama. In Krishna Avatar, Lord Kamsa and his brother also find their demise in hands of Lord Krishna. Now, these Asuras are not entirely bad because if you come to think of it they have the noble role of bringing glory to their Lord in every avatar of Lord Vishnu.

This explaination of Ramayan and the importance of Ravanan is referred to as "MAYIL RAVANAN". Ravanan who lived somewhere in Lanka didn't have to bother with some girl called Sita, didn't have to abduct her when he had a beautiful wife at home. Ravana was a devoted father and was a great King. But, alas.. he was too proud of himself and he tried to escape from the grasp of Karma. Thus, our Indian ideology is proven yet right again that Karma is what determines what happens and what will happen eventually.

THE END
Source: My mother..who heard it from her mother.. who heard it from her mother..who....and the list goes on! :)

22 comments:

Vc said...

But Divya,what we see and what we perceive is not always what might have occurred.Let us for a moment consider the fact that Ramayana did happen and that.. oh no I am not falling into the honey trap…

We have so many ways of interpreting Ramayana and your story is just one of the them, and it’s a bit skewed, but interesting none the less.

Can we have more stories/posts like this? I know you love our culture and heritage and you portray them well.

You know what the best part of our epics is, its the endless little stories that play a vital role in the “main story”. These little tit bits are like pickles in a dinner .. very very spicy :)

Shakmatisti said...

Hey there Divu.... I really appreciate u shared this very important version of the story... and its really intrestin.As a small time student of Ancient Indian history my professor had once told me tht most of the epics were written by the Aryans which have always shown the Dravidians to be the villians... remember they were enemies and Dravidians were the ones who belong to India... the Aryans were nomads.... Keep postin .. I really enjoyed it!!!!

Anonymous said...

I think in Ramayan, there was nothing like forcing Sita to get married to Ravana

so this is a kind of thing which only belongs to karma.

Nice one Divya

Prashanth said...

Hey vee... see, the version of Ramayana that we are familiar with was written by the victors... hence we can expect the truth to have been obfuscated. Its not about interpretation, but about representation of the truth itself. If you ask me, the version of Ramayana known to us is the one thats probably skewed. This one has more logic, in its own fashion... within the boundaries of Hindu mythology!

Divster said...

[Vc]

worries hav been pouring from all sorts of sources..about your reaction. Ppl are wailing.."what have u done to vee cee"

Am honored that you find me worthy of such an esteemed quality of narrating all kindsa paati stories. Hopefully U can look forward for some more paati's guest appearance here too! :P
now..if only i can find those darn glasses....

Divster said...

[Shaks]

Thanks granpa, for droppin by. Ther's no way out but to agree to ur wise words. People had rivalry back then that was far fetched to influence even the epics.. Hmmm some thoughts on that....might come up in the future posts.

Divster said...

[Anurag]

Thanks deary! I really believe that some of the questions we posed were answered well by this version of the story. Ur absolutely rite. Karma plays a major role in our mythology and must play a big role in explainin this phenomenon too.

Divster said...

[Prashu]

Bravo! U took the words out of my mouth(rather mind caus mouth busy eatin chocos). Although this version came to my attention due to my mom's passing comment about ramayana, the very fact still exists that many elders were aware of this story. But, I strongly believe only the south-indians will heed to this interpretation because in the North "ram-leela" is an important festival..and portraying Ravana or his bro as essentially good guys could get some tomatoes thrown our way.

Born a Libran said...

@divster: It was great to hear another version of the great epic. You might find this and this interesting. Keep it coming.

Divster said...

[Libran]

Oh wow! So, I have got a bit of evidence that such an interpretation was known with a few of the people!! Thats great! As I said earlier, my story comes basically from the account of my mother who heard it from elders.

I am very thrilled to note that the two sites talk in a very similar line especially the Article!!! :D Thank you soo much for sharing those sites with me! Wait, till my mum sees them...:)

Born a Libran said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Born a Libran said...

@divster: Just a little googling got me those webpages... The difference in the story is what made me do the googling...:)

Divster said...

Ahaa I see. So i started a chain reaction :P

Yes, It made my day!!![:D]Im glad i was worth it..;)

Born a Libran said...

@divster: Nice quote by Plato that u dug up :)

Divster said...

[Libran]

As Liane Cardes would say "Continuous effort(read googling), not strength or intelligence is the key to unlocking our potential."

R Girls said...

@Little - First good now ur template loooks much better and good quote by Plato. Again good version of Ramayan. You know what everystory has its own way and i liked ur mothers mothers ... way as it shows even the villian as a person with some reason.Good buddy..

Born a Libran said...

@divster: It takes intelligence to recognize/appreciate it. :)

Kirthi said...

I second (or rather third) SP on the veracity of the "original" Ramayana if there is one.
In fact I challenge the veracity of all historical/mythological legends. I believe they are just fables for the laity to understand deeper philosophical concepts in tangible terms of the world around them.
Yes there are hundreds of questions being asked about "Maryada purushottam Ram" asking his wife to undergo "Agni Pariksha" just because of a washerman's remarks.

So it is with Mahabharat. There are texts that justify Duryodhana's deeds and Karna's fate. These people weren't essentially "bad" in the black and white way we are made to believe they were. They were as human as we are and their "bad karma" was highlighted for us to learn lessons.

Divster said...

[Barbie]

Im glad u used the vocabulary "good" for me.. allthroughout ur comment. It's fun to see all those paati stories being re-lived here in the heart of europe and actually narrating it in my blog for all fellowmen to see. Who would have thought..right?

psst.by the way who is "little"?

Divster said...

[Kirthi]

U sparked a new controversy about Mahabharat which is very tempting to talk about. The whole war of Mahabharata came by little nit-bits of comments thrown in by our favorite naughty boy God Krishna.

Duryodhan's father is the rightful heir to the whole kingdom as the eldest son. But, since he was blind Pandav, his brother took over. Later on, Pandav himself gave away his power and post as a King to become a Sanyaasi. Being said this, how can the Pandavas fight for their kingdom when their dad had already given up his share and his power role in the kingdom??? Who do you think planted the seed in their minds to go and fight for what is rightfully theirs? Our very own dear Krishna.

As for Karna, he was a great-great man! And, Pandavas would have lost if not for him giving up his "kavacham"(an armor shield that he was said to have been born with) to Lord Indra. Karna is a noble soul. Krishna himself sent Indra in disguise of a bhikshuk(beggar)who asks for Karna's kavacham..which he rips it aprt from his body and gives. Brave soul.

Even in the end, Karna cannot die because his mother Bhooma-Devi would not let it. But, Krishna came again in disguise of a beggar-saint and asked Karna to give him all his glory, which Karna gave by giving every single drop of blood to him.

But, like you and Prashu said.. all this lies as a back-drop, never really known. A story with a bad guy and a good guy is what our fables are filled with.

Enigma said...

good narration1

Divster said...

Thanks Enigma :)